Paul C. Buff, Inc. Technical Forum

Technical Discussion Forum for all Paul C. Buff, Inc. Products

Login

Post a reply
 [ 2 posts ] 

Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:07 am

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 8

I've got a simple, basement studio. Not a lot of room, either with walls or ceiling.
I've been using the PCB 24x36 (with 800's) softboxes for key and fill. I've read that the octobox is a preferred light for softer looks, with portraiture (mostly what I do inside the house).

Would I gain anything from an octobox as a key light? If so, size is an important issue for me.
The 35 foldable, or the 47? The 35 would fit better in the environment I'm using, but if the 47 would perform better, I would squeeze it in.




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Sat Sep 26, 2015 5:10 pm

Site Admin
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:43 am
Posts: 5266

All else being equal, the real difference is going to be in the catch lights, with octas giving a closer to circular catchlight, which some would argue is more natural, as the sun is circular.

The square (also including rectangular) softboxes will give a square-ish catchlight. If you were inside, I would expect to see a square-ish light source from a squarish window.

In either case, it is personal taste.

Some claim an octabox has a little better wrap, since it protrudes in more directions, but I would imagine that is splitting hairs and you would be hard pressed to see any real difference. If you need a softer light source and are buying another box for that, I would go for the 47", as the 35'' is about the same size as what you have, and you would not likely see an appreciable difference.




Top Top
Profile
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a reply
 [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum